|
Post by atlantic on Jan 6, 2013 22:30:09 GMT -5
After watching the videos documenting Ekaterina Kondaurovna's early years in dance, I began to wonder if ballet was really a desirable profession for women in Russia today.
In the Imperial times, it was a way for upward mobility for lower class girls. During soviet times, they were hailed as the nation's heroes and lived above average lifestyles. It was one of the ways a women could live an independent life.
However, that video (and the recent open letter to the ministry of culture) show that a career as a dancer as poorly paid, poor working conditions and less and less national recognition. Given that it requires extremely difficult work from childhood and basically no life outside the theater as an adult, what incentive is there for the parents to even bring the child to an audition? If the parents still have to support the dancer once she begins working in the theater, it is more of a liability than a benefit. It would seem more rational to push them into medicine or law.
Now that women have more opportunities for higher education, will this combined with poor living conditions lead to a downfall of the art?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 9, 2013 13:54:34 GMT -5
Just found this now; apologies for not acknowledging it earlier. I'm off to work but will put an alert on the blog for folks to come on over here and comment. This is a great discussion to have.
|
|
cat
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by cat on Jan 10, 2013 10:18:52 GMT -5
Very interesting thoughts. I think one has to look at a bigger picture here: what was the job situation in general? What kind of other options would the have had at the time? What was the competition?
These are my thoughts on this matter, and I can only draw from what it was like in other fields of the arts (classical music) Both classical music and ballet are of course hand-in-hand and there's a lot of debate on whether or not it's still worth pursuing.
I think at this point it's not even a question whether it's a desirable profession in Russia, but in general internationally.
You're right that it used to be an above average job - parents were thrilled if their child was accepted into one of the major ballet academies in the country; it meant that later they would probably earn a decent living. Because the soloists were then celebrated as stars and was more publicized, it meant that possibly more people auditioned and were accepted than is room for in the various companies.
I don't think it is a reasonable career choice for the future. (Speaking as someone who is an artist for living) It is a much higher-pressure high-strung career than it was 30 years ago. When I talk to colleagues who joined the orchestra roughly 30 years ago, they never worried about getting a job. Clearly it was seen as a secure career path (certainly, I'm not sure how this is in ballet companies, but in the better orchestras in europe you're tenured if you pass trial time, meaning you have the job until you retire, and the pay is more than sufficient) There must have been a time when more and more students considered this a reasonable career choice, but over time of course there's more people looking for jobs than getting them.
Combining the overgrowth of qualified dancers/musicians with pay cuts/personnel cuts and the lack of audience for this kind of art, I unfortunately think it's the beginning of the end for these arts.
I can name a handful of colleagues who have had to choose other career options after having spent the majority of their lifetime studying it because the cannot get a job. I'm quite sure the same can be said of many dancers graduating from some of the bigger schools. Look at the massive talent/technique that sprouts from the Prix de Lausanne and YAGP every year, but how many job openings are there for these hopefuls?
(I'm quite sure I've rambled on thoroughly, not sure if I've made my point clear) If I should have children I will not encourage them to follow a career in the arts......
|
|
|
Post by atlantic on Jan 10, 2013 17:37:02 GMT -5
I agree that art is on the decline internationally. I think that anyone pursuing art, particularly one that is physically damaging like ballet, has to plan for a second career. It has to be assumed you will have to pursue something after dance. Teaching admin posts are difficult to come by unless you became a big star. And the chances of being a big start are pretty slim.
If it is approached with this attitude, I would be more comfortable with a child pursuing the arts. In the US at least, college is relatively easy to get into. I recently read the book 'Bunheads' by former NYCB dancer Sophie Flack (Yes, I know it was a teen novel) but the author (and the protagonist in the book) were able to go to college post-ballet career. Knowing that, I think it is less risky pursuing dance in the US.
However, in Russia, admittance to college is extremely competitive. It would be unlikely that a former dancer would be allowed in. Now that dance careers apparently don't pay well, I fear that ballet may be unable to entice parents to let their kids give up a chance at a better job to pursue ballet.
|
|
cat
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by cat on Jan 11, 2013 11:04:12 GMT -5
In Europe in general it's very difficult to get a place to study. (Not just in Russia, though I don't doubt that it's even more competitive there)
During my ballet school years, I can only name a handful of girl (over the course of ca 6 years) that were able to get a job as a dancer, though none of them made it into any companies worth mentioning. A girl in my class who got a job in a very small company ended up injured after only 2-3 years and had to get knee surgery. She transferred to an even smaller company. (not even ballet, but more the 'background' dancing in Operettas) She is now 25, from what I understood she tried to get into a university course to start something else, but was not accepted. I don't have any contact anymore to any other of my classmates, however I'm quite sure that she's not the only one facing a similar problem.
I do not know what the college situation is like in North America, however, I think it's very important for young dancers to think about what they do later. (Apart from the fact that your career is over by the time you're 40, at best)
I think professional ballet schools should seriously approach this matter. Music universities are already offering quite a few options to branch out.....
|
|
js
New Member
Posts: 2
|
Post by js on Jan 11, 2013 12:48:33 GMT -5
A career in ballet is still considered prestigious in Russia today. However there are simply more opportunities available to Russian youths today. I remember reading an interview with Ratmansky where he said he encourages his son to pursue his interest in computers or technology. Ratmansky of course himself traded up in status and money by leaving Bolshoi to take up residence in NY working with ABT and other international companies. The fact that he wants his son to achieve success in non-dance related field is very telling. In past Soviet times, most likely he would have wished for his son to follow in his footsteps because it was a more viable path to succes.
|
|